TECHNICAL PERFORMANCE
Assessment of Endovascular Team Performances Using a Data Capture Platform in the Hybrid Room
Published on
March 17, 2021
European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery
Overview
The hybrid room (HR) presents a challenging environment for surgical teams, necessitating mastery of diverse skills to minimize errors and enhance patient safety. A pilot study evaluated the use of the OR Black Box®, to analyze team performance during endovascular procedures. This observational study captured audiovisual data and procedural details from a range of elective surgeries, including endovascular abdominal aorto-iliac aneurysm repairs and treatments for symptomatic atherosclerotic disease. The findings revealed varying levels of technical and non-technical performance, with notable areas for improvement identified in communication and leadership.
The study demonstrated the feasibility of utilizing OR Black Box for workplace-based assessments, enabling a comprehensive evaluation of team dynamics, radiation safety practices, and environmental distractions. While all technical outcomes were successful in the evaluated procedures, non-technical skills often rated poorly, highlighting the need for targeted quality improvement initiatives. Future plans include a large-scale baseline study to catalogue near misses and errors, alongside implementing educational interventions to enhance safety practices and team performance, ultimately aiming to optimize patient safety and care outcomes.
Results
The study captured data from 22 endovascular procedures, revealing critical insights into team performance. Technical success was achieved in all endovascular abdominal aorto-iliac aneurysm repairs, although technical performance ratings varied, with one procedure rated poorly due to communication issues. Non-technical skills also showed room for improvement, with ratings of “1-Poor” for aspects such as leadership and task management in some cases. Conversely, surgeons' decision-making was rated positively, with 12 out of 22 instances classified as “4-Good.” The analysis highlighted environmental distractions, with an average of 43 door openings and 12 auditory distractions per procedure, indicating the need for further investigation into how such factors impact team dynamics and performance.