SURGICAL RESEARCH

Automated Capture of Intraoperative Adverse Events Using Artificial Intelligence

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Published on

February 20, 2023

Journal of Clinical Medicine

Michael B Eppler, Aref S Sayegh, Marissa Maas, Abhishek Venkat, Sij Hemal, Mihir M Desai, Andrew J Hung, Teodor Grantcharov, Giovanni E Cacciamani, Mitchell G Goldenberg
Michael B Eppler, Aref S Sayegh, Marissa Maas, Abhishek Venkat, Sij Hemal, Mihir M Desai, Andrew J Hung, Teodor Grantcharov, Giovanni E Cacciamani, Mitchell G Goldenberg
Michael B Eppler, Aref S Sayegh, Marissa Maas, Abhishek Venkat, Sij Hemal, Mihir M Desai, Andrew J Hung, Teodor Grantcharov, Giovanni E Cacciamani, Mitchell G Goldenberg

Overview

This systematic literature review was conducted to assess the current state of artificial intelligence (AI) implementation in the automatic detection of intraoperative adverse events (iAEs) during surgery. The researchers followed PRISMA-DTA standards and included articles from all surgical specialties that reported real-time, automatic identification of iAEs.

The review identified 2,982 studies, of which 13 were included for data extraction. These studies focused on detecting various iAEs, including bleeding, vessel injury, perfusion deficiencies, thermal damage, and EMG abnormalities. A meta-analysis of the AI algorithms showed promising results, with high sensitivity and specificity across the included iAEs (detection OR 14.74, CI 4.7-46.2). However, the researchers noted significant heterogeneity in the reporting of outcome statistics and article bias risk. They concluded that there is a need for standardization in iAE definitions, detection methods, and reporting to improve surgical care. The study also highlighted the versatile nature of AI technology in this field and suggested further investigation into its applications across various urologic procedures to assess the generalizability of the findings.

Results

There is a demonstrable need for the standardization of iAE identification and reporting in surgery, which may be improved with the incorporation of AI technology. While the models included in this review provide a promising foundation for the use of AI software in iAE reporting, rigorous testing of these models in larger, diverse populations is paramount. For universal iAEs, such as blood loss, existing models should be tested across different surgical specialties. Additionally, established models should be tested on different procedures within the same specialty to identify models that are more broadly applicable.